Most U.S. military aid does not add to the cumulative total. Title 22 security assistance such as FMF, IMET, PKO, INCLE, and NADR is already counted in Section 3. Foreign-funded FMS, DCS, and leases are not taxpayer money; SDAF is revolving; U.S. force posture is U.S. operations. The genuinely net-new taxpayer military assistance is Title 10 DoD programs and equipment-transfer mechanisms.
The material net-new lines are Ukraine-driven and recent. On a cumulative FY2022-FY2024 basis, USAI is approximately $32.7B appropriated and $21.2B obligated; PDA replacement is approximately $45.8B appropriated and $29.7B obligated. Recurring DoD security cooperation adds about $1.6B to $2B per year, including Section 333 at about $1.1B per year and CTEF at about $0.5B per year.
Drawdown value is not counted. PDA transfer value is reported separately and never added. The taxpayer cost is the replacement appropriation.
Recipient is not economic beneficiary. USAI buys new equipment from U.S. defense firms. PDA replacement buys new equipment for U.S. stocks. Most net-new dollars are captured by U.S. industry; the value reaching Ukraine is pre-owned drawn-down equipment, not the replacement cash.
No cross-section grand total:
Section 3 uses single-year obligations and Section 5 uses multi-year cumulative appropriations. These bases are not merged. Harmonization is carried as Open Question A-017.
Scope and method
This section covers taxpayer-funded transfer of defense articles, services, training, and security assistance to non-U.S. recipients. It separates already-counted Title 22 assistance from net-new Title 10 programs and equipment-transfer mechanisms.
Net-new military assistance
Lane
Basis
Figure
Treatment
USAI
FY2022-FY2024 cumulative
≈ $32.7B appropriated / $21.2B obligated
Net-new taxpayer assistance
PDA replacement
FY2022-FY2024 cumulative
≈ $45.8B appropriated / $29.7B obligated
Taxpayer replacement cost
Section 333
Recurring annual
≈ $1.1B per year
Recurring DoD security cooperation
CTEF
Recurring annual
≈ $0.5B per year
Recurring train-and-equip lane
Drawdowns and replacement
PDA transfer value is not the same as taxpayer cash cost. Reported drawdown values, including disputed values and GAO-identified overvaluation, are not added to the military-aid total. The countable taxpayer cost is the replacement appropriation used to replenish U.S. stocks.
Beneficiary-chain finding
Section 5 widens the gap between Total A and Total B. In many cases, taxpayer cash flows to U.S. defense industry or replenishes U.S. stocks, while the non-U.S. recipient receives equipment, services, training, or earlier-drawn assets. The cash recipient, economic beneficiary, and foreign military beneficiary must be kept distinct.
Plain English Bottom Line
The clean military-aid number is not every announced weapons figure. Already-counted foreign-assistance military grants stay in Section 3, foreign-funded sales are excluded, drawdown values are reported separately, and replacement appropriations are treated as the taxpayer cost. The major net-new taxpayer lane is Ukraine-related, and much of that cash is captured domestically by U.S. industry.